
President Trump has repeatedly said heāll take on toxic chemicals āĀ but many ofĀ his administration’s actions are expected to allow for more pollution,Ā not less.
During his joint address to CongressĀ earlier this month, Trump talked about a boy whose cancer he blamed on a chemical exposure, saying that reversing the rise in child cancer rates in recent decades is āone of the top priorities for our new presidential commission to Make America Healthy Again.”
āOur goal is to get toxins out of our environment, poisons out of our food supply and keep our children healthy and strong,ā he added.Ā
More broadly, Trump has adopted hisĀ Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.ās āMake America Healthy Againā slogan āĀ saying heāll take on toxic substances that threaten Americansā well-being.
āPresident Trumpās agenda is proof that we can restore American energy dominance while advancing environmental stewardship. President Trump is committed to replacing unclean foreign energy with the liquid gold under our feet while Making America Healthy Again by ridding our environment, water, and food supply of dangerous toxins,ā White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in an email.
Weeks into Trump’s second term, the Department of Health and Human ServicesĀ does appear poised to move toward chemical regulation in food.
KennedyĀ said this weekĀ that the administration would āexplore potential rulemakingā in response to a loophole that currently allows companies to put chemicals in food without telling regulators.Ā
But theĀ administration has also taken significant steps to abandon or roll back efforts to reduce exposure to potentially toxic substances.
Last week, itĀ dropped a lawsuitĀ that aimed to force a company to reduce its emissions of a substance the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers likely to cause cancerĀ in an already highly polluted area.
The administration also indicated that it is likely toĀ reduce the stringency of safety screeningsĀ for potentially harmful chemicals. Among the chemicals that are currently undergoing the screening process isĀ vinyl chloride, a toxic substance used to make PVC plastic that was released, along with other chemicals, in a train derailment in Ohio in 2023. Trump repeatedly bashed the Biden administration’s response to the crash on the campaign trail last year.
The administration alsoĀ signaled plansĀ to roll back Biden-era rules that aim to prevent chemical disasters at 12,000 industrial facilities, including chemical manufacturers and distributors, oil refineries, food and beverage manufacturers and agricultural supply distributors.
This week, the EPA also announced aĀ broad slate of environmental rollbacks. Among the regulations the agency says it may reverse is a Biden-era rule regulating emissions of the carcinogen ethylene oxide, which is used to sterilize medical devices.Ā
In January, the EPA alsoĀ withdrew Biden-era plansĀ toĀ put a limit on the amount of āforever chemicalsā that manufacturers are allowed to releaseĀ into the water.
These chemicals ā per-Ā andĀ polyfluoroalkyl substances known as PFAS, which can last for a very long time in the environment instead of breaking down ā are found in common products like nonstick pans and waterproof clothing and cosmetics. They have also been linked to a wide range of illnesses including cancers and immune system and fertility issues.Ā
In addition, the administration has appointed a number of formerĀ chemical industry insidersĀ to key roles within the EPA. The top official currently listedĀ in the agency’s office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention used to work for a chemical industry trade and lobbying group.Ā
Trump’s pick for the No. 2 role at the EPAĀ represented opponents of a ban on asbestosĀ in court. His nominee to lead its air and radiation office hasĀ lobbied on behalf of makers of āforever chemicalsāĀ and users of ethylene oxide, among others. The administration has also hired a 30-year veteran of chemical company DuPont, which has historically made and used āforever chemicals.ā
A spokesperson for the EPA argued that the administration can balance environmental protection and the economy.Ā
āNo longer will the EPA view the goals of protecting our environment and growing our economy as binary choices. We will and we must choose both,ā the spokesperson said. āThis week, Administrator [Lee] Zeldin participated in the first meeting of the Make American Healthy Again Commission led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and our team at EPA looks forward to closely collaborating on ways to fulfill President Trumpās goal of removing toxins from the environment and our food supply and keeping our children healthy and strong.āĀ
Environmental advocates, however, have sounded alarms about the potential impact of the administration’s moves.
Daniel Rosenberg, director of federal toxics policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, described the appointment of industry-tied individuals to high ranking positions as equivalent to allowing a fox to guard a hen house.Ā
āEvery fox guarding the hen house or the chicken coop is a problem,ā he said.Ā
Eve Gartner, director of crosscutting toxics strategies at advocacy group Earthjustice, said that the administration’s likely reduction of the stringency of chemical safety screenings would impact reviews for chemicals like that released in the East Palestine, Ohio, train crash ā though whether vinyl chloride itself would be subject to a looser review would depend on how long it takes the administration to finish the rollback.
She said that if the Trump administration makes the changes it has signaled, it may āignore the impact of vinyl chloride on fence line communities and communities along transportation routes that are vulnerable to that kind of disaster that we saw in East Palestine.ā
More broadly, she warned that the administration’s pro-industry policies could result in significant damage to Americans’ health.
āWe know that the rules that were adopted in the Biden administration would result in significant health benefits for communities including lower cancer rates and rolling back those rules inevitably will result in more cancer, including more children with cancer,ā Gartner said.Ā
Ā